Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: poll function in cygwin From: Robert Collins To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20020828023648.GA28525@redhat.com> References: <20020827111431 DOT T5475 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <777081412 DOT 20020827132703 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20020827115845 DOT U5475 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20020827145458 DOT GC10134 AT redhat DOT com> <1030499901 DOT 13255 DOT 389 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20020828023648 DOT GA28525 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-WG+x7rKIgLoG112F/NUG" Date: 28 Aug 2002 12:53:01 +1000 Message-Id: <1030503181.13255.401.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-WG+x7rKIgLoG112F/NUG Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 12:36, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I was not asserting that WaitForMultipleObjects could wait for >64 > handles. I was saying that cygwin's select() can do so. Doh. Sorry. Here is me munching my words... munch munch munch. Rob --=-WG+x7rKIgLoG112F/NUG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA9bDsMI5+kQ8LJcoIRAvm9AJ9s5ENtunSt1GK6SxarVHmZ83JBzgCgr0rB WOPqRBN3GcM3qkzHWnkzOe8= =XfUf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-WG+x7rKIgLoG112F/NUG--