Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3D6557DE.7060300@mscha.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 23:30:06 +0200
From: Michael Schaap <cygwin AT mscha DOT org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020722
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: CSS in the User's Guide (was:Updating dll info...)
References: <20020821190517 DOT 11415 DOT qmail AT web20008 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <Xns92729D04F4EB5soren1Gmane AT 80 DOT 91 DOT 224 DOT 249>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: at mscha.org by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)

On 22-8-2002 21:24, Soren A wrote:
> 
> I've seen no evidence that either you or Chris have taken the time to
> view the source of one of the UG pages. What I have been talking about
> all along is that DocBook is *already using CSS* in the output that is
> the UG pages. The effort required to have discovered a fragment of a
> page chosen at random, like this one (using.html#USING-PATHNAMES): 
> 
>   By default, the POSIX root <TT CLASS="FILENAME">/</TT> points to
>   the system partition but it can be relocated to any directory in
>   the Windows file system using the <B CLASS="COMMAND">mount</B>
>   command.
> 
> seems really minimal. I have no idea why the people I am responding to
> found it beyond them (`grep -i 'CLASS='' ???) . Only complete
> unfamiliarity with HTML -- and I grant that this is a possibility, I
> realize that not all C/C++ programmers are Web page builders -- would
> leave one unable to quickly recognize that in that fragment there are
> TWO references to Cascading Style Sheets: 
> 
>   <TT CLASS="FILENAME">
>   <B CLASS="COMMAND">
> 
> Yet these documents have no definition of what "COMMAND" or "FILENAME"
> should mean to the browser being asked to render the page. Half of the
> mechanism of CSS is *already* present in the documents, the other half
> is *missing*. 

May I recommend that you read:
	http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#h-7.5.2
*carefully*?
Please tell us where it insists that you must have CSS style rules 
whenever you use the 'class' attribute.

> 
> Lastly, my final suggestion:
>    (3) Don't emulate Chris Faylor in terms of taking verbal stances or 
> attitudes.

Now if this isn't the pot calling the kettle black ...

  - Michael


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/