Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Originating-IP: [172.186.39.56] From: "the_real_genneth" To: Subject: RE: newbie's gripe with NT/2K/XP integration Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 17:57:01 +0100 Message-ID: <000001c2486a$9b1c6da0$3827baac@GENNETH8691> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Aug 2002 16:57:08.0037 (UTC) FILETIME=[9E5C2F50:01C2486A] >> [snip] removing support for 9x would make cygwin code >> smaller and neater (i'm an advocate of _very_ elegant coding), not to >> mention faster and more secure (what do you know, i mentioned them >> anyway :). > >Why don't you do it and report back to the list on the speed gains? I intend to do that as soon as I have time. Exams weigh heavily on the mind of small time fiddlers such as me. > >There are security problems with Cygwin that have nothing to do with the >non-NT Windows. I understand that. And I also understand that there _are_ security problems with Cygwin that have something to do with non-NT Windows. Genneth -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/