Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:43:34 +0200
From: quetschke AT scytek DOT de
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT yahoo DOT com>,
   gnupg-devel AT gnupg DOT org
Subject: Re: Patches for gnupg 1.0.7 / cygwin 1.3.10
Message-ID: <20020820144334.GA543981@MILAMBER>
References: <20020605140641 DOT 22927 DOT qmail AT web21001 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <87bs7xdhl3 DOT fsf AT alberti DOT gnupg DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="envbJBWh7q8WU6mo"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87bs7xdhl3.fsf@alberti.gnupg.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i

--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi!

> > I am not into personal attacks, please view this as constructive critis=
m,
> > but I find your line of reasoning to be highly fallacious.  The whole
> > point of the cygwin project is to "free" Windows users from the
> > restrictions and non-posix compliance of their OS.  It allows them to h=
ave
> > a choice in how they run their software and how it behaves.  We aren't
>=20
> I see your point and will step back.=20
Thank you very much, it's no fun maintaining a fork.
>=20
> What we should do then is to change the half-existing Cygwin support
> to support Cygwin really in a Unix way and not a mixed
> w32/cygwin support.  The goal is to let it work in the best way
> with mutt ans similar programs.=20
Hmm, most of the work was removing the "support" for Cygwin, because
it is more POSIX/UNIX like than most people think.

> We can't do this for 1.2.0 but it should be a goal for 1.2.1.
I will post details/patches in a follow-up to the gnupg-dev mailing list,
here on the cygwin mailing list is already to much traffic.
=20
> Okay?
Sure!

>   Werner
Bis bald

    Volker

--=20
PGP/GPG key (ID: 0x9F8A785D) available from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net
key-fingerprint 550D F17E B082 A3E9 F913  9E53 3D35 C9BA 9F8A 785D

--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (Cygwin32)

iD8DBQE9YlWVPTXJup+KeF0RAj3PAKDbCrCzSLceP3ieOc0drvghhvISAQCfZrE6
gh1rxkf2kK28FeANPDaSAnQ=
=CLEI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo--