Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 17:19:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: another "C compiler cannot create executables"
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020817135003.020665a0@pop3.cris.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0208171715470.21909-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Randall R Schulz wrote:

> Unfortunately, with a name as short as "as," you get many spurious hits.

Searches for "bin/as" or "as.exe" both result in a manageable number of
hits.  In general, if the exact program name is known, appending a ".exe"
or prepending "bin/" (or both) is usually a safe course...
	Igor

On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Randall R Schulz wrote:

> Fernando,
>
> "As" is the assembler. It's part of the "binutils" package. If you don't
> have "as," it's probably because you didn't select the "binutils" package
> for installation.
>
> It has been a common design element in Unix compilers for decades for the
> code generator to produce assembly, not machine code. Then a separate pass
> by the assembler produces object code.
>
>
> When in doubt about missing tools, go here: <http://cygwin.com/packages/>
> to check which package contains a particular binary. Unfortunately, with a
> name as short as "as," you get many spurious hits. In this case, the
> summary text for each package in the listing might be a better source of
> information:
>
> - binutils
>    The GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities
>
>
> Randall Schulz
> Mountain View, CA USA
>
>
> At 12:25 2002-08-17, Fernando Martins wrote:
>
> >I've the same symptom as Piyush Kacha but the cause seems different:
> >
> >(from config.log)
> >configure:2422: checking for C compiler default output
> >configure:2425: gcc -D_WIN32   conftest.c  >&5
> >gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `as': No such file or directory
> >configure:2428: $? = 1
> >configure: failed program was:
> >
> >What's 'as'? Doesn't seem to be a package. What can I do?
> >
> >Maybe related, the previous version of gcc (2.95.3-5) was GPFing (for
> >unknown reason to me) and that's why I upgraded.
> >
> >Any help appreciated,
> >
> >TIA,
> >
> >Fernando Martins
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>

-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

It took the computational power of three Commodore 64s to fly to the moon.
It takes a 486 to run Windows 95.  Something is wrong here. -- SC sig file


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/