Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020817135003.020665a0@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 13:55:58 -0700
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject: Re: another "C compiler cannot create executables"
In-Reply-To: <LPBBLICABBLMEDAGGKOFAEHKCGAA.fmartins@hetnet.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Fernando,

"As" is the assembler. It's part of the "binutils" package. If you don't 
have "as," it's probably because you didn't select the "binutils" package 
for installation.

It has been a common design element in Unix compilers for decades for the 
code generator to produce assembly, not machine code. Then a separate pass 
by the assembler produces object code.


When in doubt about missing tools, go here: <http://cygwin.com/packages/> 
to check which package contains a particular binary. Unfortunately, with a 
name as short as "as," you get many spurious hits. In this case, the 
summary text for each package in the listing might be a better source of 
information:

- binutils
   The GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities


Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA


At 12:25 2002-08-17, Fernando Martins wrote:

>I've the same symptom as Piyush Kacha but the cause seems different:
>
>(from config.log)
>configure:2422: checking for C compiler default output
>configure:2425: gcc -D_WIN32   conftest.c  >&5
>gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `as': No such file or directory
>configure:2428: $? = 1
>configure: failed program was:
>
>What's 'as'? Doesn't seem to be a package. What can I do?
>
>Maybe related, the previous version of gcc (2.95.3-5) was GPFing (for
>unknown reason to me) and that's why I upgraded.
>
>Any help appreciated,
>
>TIA,
>
>Fernando Martins


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/