Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020815085006.01fa35d8@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 08:58:17 -0700 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, crossgcc AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: RE: Cygwin takes *forever* to run gcc's configure! In-Reply-To: <4A798B3E3B58794FB40A47DFCE728BA8485453@STR1VEXC002.CTHES.C OM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Hi, The Norton AntiVirus controls offer you a direct and "sanctioned" way to disable or suspend virus checking without resort to subterfuge such as invoking the debugger (assuming you have it installed, that is--is that option even available if you don't have a debugger installed on your system? I don't think so, but I'm not going to uninstall Visual C++ just to find out...). Personally, I don't enable my Norton Anti-Virus for continual monitoring. I only use it on demand, either to make a full sweep (on rare occasions) or when I receive a file that I find suspicious. I've never had an active infection and only rarely have I ever discovered a virus in the first place. Discounting the obvious ones, I could (if my memory were perfect) almost certainly count on one hand the number of times I found a virus when I wasn't already expecting one. Randall Schulz Mountain View, CA USA At 08:26 2002-08-15, Jimm Burk wrote: >Dan, > >Are you using win2K? if so start the task manager and switch to >processes: > >If you are using Norton Antivirus you will find a process NOPDB.EXE which >has something to with Norton. Check the process time of all the running >processes and you may find the culprit. In my case it has always been the >NOPDB. Which, by the way you CANNOT kill directly. :( Right click the >process and say debug. You can then stop the process and low and behold >cygwin will start moving again. This seems to appear more on the >non-Intel processors, I have no idea why. > >Regards, >Jimm Burk -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/