Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <005e01c24435$f6620690$0100a8c0@wdg.uk.ibm.com> From: "Max Bowsher" To: References: <00fd01c243e3$2ea09bf0$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com> <87znvoa5r8 DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower> Subject: Re: texmf src package is a copy of the tetex source package (or at least has the same length and md5sum) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:30:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > "Max Bowsher" writes: >> Since the current texmf is only an upgrade helper, it doesn't really >> need a source package at all. > > Why do you feel that way? The upgrade helper packages were also > created, and thus have a source package (but a bit smaller than 39MB > :-) A source package for a couple of readme files? That seems rather ... overengineered? Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/