Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 18:12:18 -0400
From: Jon LaBadie <jcyg AT jgcomp DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: @file handling in Cygwin
Message-ID: <20020814221218.GA29230@butch.jgcomp.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Jon LaBadie <jcyg AT jgcomp DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <762C0A863A7674478671627FEAF584812C3578 AT hqmail01 DOT powertv DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <762C0A863A7674478671627FEAF584812C3578@hqmail01.powertv.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 03:01:55PM -0700, Cheng, Cheuk wrote:
> Thanks all for their comments.  Using ls -@lsflags will give "ls:
> invalid option -- @" instead.  I also know of cat and xargs but I just
> want to check whether @file is supported _within_ Cygwin or not.

Where is it supported?  I've never seen it?

Is it an "os" or "shell" feature so that it is not "ls" specific?

Otherwise I'd think an ls(1) man page perusal would answer
the question negatively.

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jcyg AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/