Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 09:39:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Problems with display of inode numbers In-Reply-To: <20020809123200.0f46bcfc.jim.george@blueyonder.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Jim George wrote: > Folks, > why is it that when I do and ls -lisa the output is not neatly > lined up? > I can use any other option except '-i' and it lines up perfectly. This > appears to affect all terminals, except the cmd window. > Jim Jim, From the source of ls: /* The field width for inode numbers. On some hosts inode numbers are 64 bits, so columns won't line up exactly when a huge inode number is encountered, but in practice 7 digits is usually enough. */ #ifndef INODE_DIGITS # define INODE_DIGITS 7 #endif This is your problem. AFAICT, Win2k has inode numbers well in excess of 7 digits (10, in my case). If you want inode numbers to line up perfectly, change the value above to 10 (line 145) and recompile ls. BTW, ls is part of fileutils. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! It took the computational power of three Commodore 64s to fly to the moon. It takes a 486 to run Windows 95. Something is wrong here. -- SC sig file -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/