Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020808073257.01f9e650@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 07:36:16 -0700 To: "Dylan Cuthbert" , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: 256mb limit in cygwin - heap_chunk_in_mb not working? In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Dylan, "It worked for me." It was a long time ago, though, on a system far, far away. Are you sure you're setting the correct registry entry? I noticed that in my registry the Cygwin keys appear in more than one place, perhaps because of the history of installations I've done or perhaps owing to one of those a per-user vs. system-wide registry things (I don't know a whole lot about the registry). Randall Schulz Mountain View, CA USA At 05:57 2002-08-08, Dylan Cuthbert wrote: >No replies to this for about a week and we're stumped at this end - does >anyone know whether this cygwin registry key is *intended* to work or not? >Is this a bug or simply an unimplemented feature? Is it a limitation >somewhere higher up (lower down) than cygwin (in the w32 process heap >manager or something?) > >Ive seen plenty of mails regarding this and this is the only solution listed >(no "it worked!" confirmation mails however). I can't see what's wrong, I'm >putting the registry key in the right place and everything, I've even logged >in as administrator and made sure the key is set in that environment too. >Has anyone allocated more than 256 megs in a cygwin compiled app? > >Regards > >--------------------------------- >Dylan Cuthbert. > > >"Dylan Cuthbert" wrote in message >news:aidgav$c23$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org... > > Hi all > > > > I have edited/created the DWORD registry entry heap_chunk_in_mb (the ls of > > /proc/registry is below) and it reads 512 in regedit. > > > > I reboot but still a simple program that does new char[ 256 * 1024 * 1024 ] > > will run out of memory. > > > > AFAIK I am using the recent versions of absolutely everything. (cygcheck > > below) > > > > Any ideas what's going on, I want to run some memory intensive algorithmic > > programs and can't because of this problem. > > > > Regards > > > > --------------------------------- >Dylan Cuthbert -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/