Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Retraction
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <3D51DDF4.2131.95FCA6F@localhost>
References: <3D51DDF4 DOT 2131 DOT 95FCA6F AT localhost>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-pERdyGFVCxOFajpBnKwV"
Date: 08 Aug 2002 17:13:39 +1000
Message-Id: <1028790820.20180.11.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0

--=-pERdyGFVCxOFajpBnKwV
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 16:56, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
<snip>

Chris,
    It appears that the flame fest is still festering.=20

I really hesitate to ask this, but can we set a deadline, effective from
your reply to this email (should you reply, and it being affirmative),
and any emails continuing the flame fest sent after that point result in
a ban on the individual sending the email (with appropriate headers
inspected for forging, of course).=20

This list is *so* much better when it stays vaguely on-topic. I'd really
hate to have to take a holiday, like Chuck, but I can't meaningfully
process the sheer volume of off-topic email that has occured recently.

Rob

--=-pERdyGFVCxOFajpBnKwV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA9UhojI5+kQ8LJcoIRAp23AJ9S25wa2IvH8SEtpUdMvF+IfubGvgCfe4dJ
5uxb9vrChh/kQOw75VBD/IQ=
=BaBh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-pERdyGFVCxOFajpBnKwV--