Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 21:07:52 +0100 From: Jim George To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Top reporting on cygwin processes only? Message-Id: <20020806210752.24512cc5.jim.george@blueyonder.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20020806142354.GA19193@redhat.com> References: <20020805223042 DOT 39e9de67 DOT jim DOT george AT blueyonder DOT co DOT uk> <20020806095533 DOT O3921 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20020806112623 DOT 2950e6f5 DOT jim DOT george AT blueyonder DOT co DOT uk> <20020806142354 DOT GA19193 AT redhat DOT com> Organization: JSDM Services Ltd Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 10:23:54 -0400 Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 11:26:23AM +0100, Jim George wrote: > >should ps be modified to work as top does, of course /proc would need > >to be upgraded, or can top be modified to work as ps does, or should > >both continue on their own but be updated to recognise all processes > >running on a box? > > 'ps --help' will show you an option for displaying windows processes as > well as cygwin processes. > > cgf > I'm aware that ps -W shows both but what I was driving at in my own befuddled way is, shouldn't both top and ps be capable of reporting on both, i.e bring top in to line with ps? Based on what Corrina said this would mean a major change to one or other of the utilities since top uses /proc but ps uses the cygwin api. Hence which, if any, should change? Jim -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/