Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 15:02:50 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: GNU emacs 21.2 ported (alpha) to cygwin
Message-ID: <20020806190250.GA12996@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <1028655645 DOT 4210 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <20020806181907 DOT 51222 DOT qmail AT web20006 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020806181907.51222.qmail@web20006.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 11:19:07AM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>I'm as much for a real GNU Emacs package as anyone, but would 
>you guys mind bzip2'ing your attachments or cutting off all the 
>uneccessary configure/make output? 

Cutting off unnecessary cruft is much preferred in any message.  I'd
rather not see too many bzip2'ed attachments here.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/