Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:27:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin To: cygwin Subject: Re: Top reporting on cygwin processes only? In-Reply-To: <20020806095533.O3921@cygbert.vinschen.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 07:10:50PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > P.S. Top walks the process table in the same way ps does. It shouldn't > > No. ps uses the Cygwin API, top uses /proc. /proc only contains Cygwin > processes. > > Corinna Yes, of course. Thanks, Corinna. What I guess I meant is that once top and ps get their lists of processes, they're essentially trying to get similar info about them (but from different sources). So it should be possible to augment top with a function that walks the list of windows processes and extracts the needed info. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! It took the computational power of three Commodore 64s to fly to the moon. It takes a 486 to run Windows 95. Something is wrong here. -- SC sig file -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/