Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Oops?
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0208042155540.694-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0208042155540 DOT 694-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-Qukj+u0t8lb2cUoULvl0"
Date: 05 Aug 2002 12:04:29 +1000
Message-Id: <1028513075.8966.178.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0

--=-Qukj+u0t8lb2cUoULvl0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2002-08-05 at 11:58, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> It's a question for the packagers whether the dll version should be
> consistent with the package version.

It's not a question. The dll version is orthogonal to the package
version.

Rob


--=-Qukj+u0t8lb2cUoULvl0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEABECAAYFAj1N3SwACgkQI5+kQ8LJcoI9mACgzXGwMZly49Bnqm2yg+iFnOeR
a8MAoLccw4RVYRw31PyaF74Xa/KmL2iM
=kDAC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Qukj+u0t8lb2cUoULvl0--