Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 21:58:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Igor Pechtchanski Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Oops? In-Reply-To: <3D4B77A7.24527.31861E2@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Stephen C. Biggs wrote: > Am I right? Did someone make a small error? > > I just tried to update my cygwin installation and found that there was > version 1.3.12-3 of the cygwin DLL. Downloading and looking at the > resulting installed DLL in /bin gives a version of 1.3.12 and file date > a couple of days before Version 1.3.12-1! > > This seems to be the case for a couple of mirrors: > http://archive.progeny.com and http://planetmirror.com . I believe the 1.3.12-3 refers to the version of the main cygwin package, not the dll. See http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-08/msg00168.html It's a question for the packagers whether the dll version should be consistent with the package version. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! It took the computational power of three Commodore 64s to fly to the moon. It takes a 486 to run Windows 95. Something is wrong here. -- SC sig file -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/