Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: rebase and ME From: Robert Collins To: Ralf Habacker Cc: cygwin In-Reply-To: <00cb01c23bb5$de198910$651c440a@BRAMSCHE> References: <00cb01c23bb5$de198910$651c440a AT BRAMSCHE> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-XrI8MQPQNanWWO5FrlcP" Date: 04 Aug 2002 23:47:21 +1000 Message-Id: <1028468842.8690.166.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-XrI8MQPQNanWWO5FrlcP Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2002-08-04 at 22:53, Ralf Habacker wrote: > Yes I have fixed some problem in the bfd part used by objdump, but I not = ready > for writing such an application, because my current knowledge isn't enoug= h about > the bfd internals. I'm willing to invest some time to learn this stuff (a= s I > said, because I need this knowledge for another topic too), but what abou= t the > solution Steve O Brien has offered. Should we not wait, until we have a > definitive answer, if this work or not ? No. Why not? Because anything based on imagehlp.dll will be subject to ms's vaguaries, and rebinding and rebasing .dll's does bring a performance improvement. If we can't rebind/rebase on windows ME via imagehlp.dll we will need a libbfd solution eventually - even if Steve's patch does allow binaries to run, they won't be as fast as they could be. Rob --=-XrI8MQPQNanWWO5FrlcP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEABECAAYFAj1NMGkACgkQI5+kQ8LJcoLIQwCgoaGefJXm+gEGhl2oq56Ft21Y cFwAoJZMAORosm2hqOZ+F4OYJW2Q8RrS =g24V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-XrI8MQPQNanWWO5FrlcP--