Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: "Reply-To'' Munging Considered Harmful From: Robert Collins To: Samuel Cc: Cygwin mailing list In-Reply-To: <01f101c23b56$2ec2f4b0$a352a518@samsystem> References: <01f101c23b56$2ec2f4b0$a352a518 AT samsystem> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1bS8/W1tqvYlsyCrsW4p" Date: 04 Aug 2002 12:35:54 +1000 Message-Id: <1028428555.9565.155.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-1bS8/W1tqvYlsyCrsW4p Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2002-08-04 at 11:28, Samuel wrote: > In the "Reply-To:" munging article that Randall referred to that is at: >=20 > >=20 > it says: >=20 > they haven't bothered to learn to use the ``reply-to-group'' feature = of > their mailer >=20 > Is that implying that the reply-to-group feature should work for mailing > lists? Yes, but when reading that article, please remember that the author is focused on unix mail clients, which tend to be more feature rich (IMO) that win32 mail clients - particularly MS ones. Rob --=-1bS8/W1tqvYlsyCrsW4p Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEABECAAYFAj1MkwoACgkQI5+kQ8LJcoIFTACfSL5mVyDc8Vt5fnTmPwURWc37 DqsAmgO892AQM/ZCoHLdFvNF6B+EPLwe =8uVa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1bS8/W1tqvYlsyCrsW4p--