Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <004301c23afa$ad6afc60$0100a8c0@wdg.uk.ibm.com> From: "Max Bowsher" Cc: References: <3D4B5AEF DOT 32421 DOT 3651B0CF AT localhost><1028370295 DOT 8690 DOT 117 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <00b601c23ae5$209913e0$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com> <1028377672 DOT 8690 DOT 120 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> Subject: Re: Pathname context Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 15:32:39 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Robert Collins wrote: > On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 21:41, Max Bowsher wrote: >> I can see why this _is_ happening, but is this: >> >> max AT POMELLO [~] $ cygpath -wa c:/cygwin/usr/lib >> C:\cygwin\lib >> >> actually what _should_ happen? >> >> Shouldn't a DOS-style path be taken as-is? I can understand the /usr/bin -> >> /bin, /usr/lib -> /lib mappings, and have even added my own /usr/sbin -> /sbin, >> but, to me, a DOS-style path should taken literally. > > At a guess (check the source for an authoritative answer): > > c:/cygwin/usr/lib -> /usr/lib (based on / mount point) > /usr/lib -> c:\cygwin\lib Very believable... but I was proposing a change in behaviour so that DOS paths refer to what they look like, and don't get redirected, on the grounds that if that is what you type, then that is what you mean. Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/