Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Pathname context From: Robert Collins To: dwyatt AT sunflower DOT com Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <3D4B9D23.795.37544F56@localhost> References: <3D4B5AEF DOT 32421 DOT 3651B0CF AT localhost> <3D4B9D23 DOT 795 DOT 37544F56 AT localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-F0QQW1km/WJ6F+LwOgtb" Date: 04 Aug 2002 00:27:40 +1000 Message-Id: <1028384860.8690.128.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-F0QQW1km/WJ6F+LwOgtb Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2002-08-04 at 00:06, Doug Wyatt wrote: > How should the mounts be setup such that 'ls d:/cygwin-v11x/usr/lib' > and 'ls /d/cygwin-v11x/usr/lib' would BOTH show the contents of /lib? > Or, to extend the question a bit, how can mounts be setup so that > ALL instances of the use of 'ls' show only Cygwin context files and > dirs rather than Windows context (where Cygwin mounts are unknown)? I'd need to check the source to provide a solid answer. So I'll pass the buck to someone else to answer for now, if I get time I'll research it, but no promises. My suggestion is to look into path canonicalisation, and what differences there are between 'pure' windows paths (d:/...) and 'cygdrive' paths. Rob --=-F0QQW1km/WJ6F+LwOgtb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEABECAAYFAj1L6FsACgkQI5+kQ8LJcoIL9wCgr+WzKVp4+0yQZ5u62M7LndlK b3IAmQFvtitZQdrvRx7SzM/SeeruWPFB =Q/w0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-F0QQW1km/WJ6F+LwOgtb--