Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Pathname context From: Robert Collins To: Max Bowsher Cc: dwyatt AT sunflower DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <00b601c23ae5$209913e0$0100a8c0@wdg.uk.ibm.com> References: <3D4B5AEF DOT 32421 DOT 3651B0CF AT localhost> <1028370295 DOT 8690 DOT 117 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <00b601c23ae5$209913e0$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-WcKe9d5uuTgBL4/cxx7M" Date: 03 Aug 2002 22:27:52 +1000 Message-Id: <1028377672.8690.120.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-WcKe9d5uuTgBL4/cxx7M Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 21:41, Max Bowsher wrote: > I can see why this _is_ happening, but is this: >=20 > max AT POMELLO [~] $ cygpath -wa c:/cygwin/usr/lib > C:\cygwin\lib >=20 > actually what _should_ happen? >=20 > Shouldn't a DOS-style path be taken as-is? I can understand the /usr/bin = -> > /bin, /usr/lib -> /lib mappings, and have even added my own /usr/sbin -> = /sbin, > but, to me, a DOS-style path should taken literally. At a guess (check the source for an authoritative answer): c:/cygwin/usr/lib -> /usr/lib (based on / mount point) /usr/lib -> c:\cygwin\lib Rob --=-WcKe9d5uuTgBL4/cxx7M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEABECAAYFAj1LzEcACgkQI5+kQ8LJcoLYvgCfVkT+vE/F12zrLhfwdIbYffHl jFUAoJoLl0XfkYCJ/C069A0uw3JQPnKe =75le -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-WcKe9d5uuTgBL4/cxx7M--