Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Pathname context From: Robert Collins To: dwyatt AT sunflower DOT com Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <3D4B5AEF.32421.3651B0CF@localhost> References: <3D4B5AEF DOT 32421 DOT 3651B0CF AT localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-sGtl5vj75VQ00Ikj/eRv" Date: 03 Aug 2002 20:24:50 +1000 Message-Id: <1028370295.8690.117.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-sGtl5vj75VQ00Ikj/eRv Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2002-08-03 at 19:24, Doug Wyatt wrote: >=20 > Yesterday morning I posted a query about 'ls' seeing /usr/lib as a > proper Cygwin directory using one pathname and as a DOS/Windows > directory (absent the mounted /lib contents) with what I thought was > an equivalent pathname. Perhaps it was overlooked in all the P.D. > hoopla. The behaviour is expected based on your mount table. Rob --=-sGtl5vj75VQ00Ikj/eRv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEABECAAYFAj1Lr3IACgkQI5+kQ8LJcoJOsACgzsWB+KkkdmK+oDM8j6U4cKr6 Xf4AoJSNJVX1spfucDr+qZDs7jxvm0yv =R0Ag -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-sGtl5vj75VQ00Ikj/eRv--