Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 13:41:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Birl <sbirl AT astro DOT ocis DOT temple DOT edu>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: lsof port
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.32.0208021333060.5750-100000@typhoon.ocis.temple.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

CGF:	  Thanks for the backhanded answer you supplied.  The program you
          mentioned would be a nice thing to have it didnt crash the
          NT server.  (Ive already sent a bug complaint to the developer).

Chris J:  Thanks for looking into this.


In the meantime I will dig around for something stable.  I certainly hope
that there will be a Cygwin version of lsof sometime in the near future.


 Thanks

 Scott Birl      Scott DOT Birl AT temple DOT edu
 UNIX Consultant/Systems Administrator   Computer  Services   Temple University
 1805 North Broad Street  Philadelphia   Pennsylvania 19122   United States
====*====*====*====*====*====*====*====+====*====*====*====*====*====*====*====*





Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 23:15:23 +0100
From: Chris January <chris AT atomice DOT net>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: lsof

    [ The following text is in the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set.  ]
    [ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

> I searched the Cygwin website for lsof and found nothing, and I know
that
> this question could be directed to the lsof list but I could not
subscribe
> to it.
>
> Here's my question:
>
> Will there be any plans to port lsof to Cygwin?
>
> I cant think of any NT utility to do what lsof does, and I tried to
> compile lsof 4.55 sometime ago, but it failed (though I cant remember
why)
This could be done through /proc in future, perhaps.
I will look into it.

Chris



    [ Part 6: "Included Message" ]

Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:07:08 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: lsof (porting plans)

On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 01:01:42PM -0400, Birl wrote:
>I searched the Cygwin website for lsof and found nothing, and I know that
>this question could be directed to the lsof list but I could not
subscribe
>to it.
>
>Here's my question:
>
>Will there be any plans to port lsof to Cygwin?

If you searched the cygwin web site, including mailing list archives and
found no mention of lsof then it is a very safe bet that there are no
plans to port it.

I hope that this message, which is now in the archives, will serve to
make this clear for future people searching for a port of whatever.

In the meantime, if you want a generic windows utility which does
something
similar to lsof (which I had to lookup by the way -- it would be nice
if people didn't assume that everyone else shared their knowledge of
packages they want ported), check out http://www.sysinternals.com .

cgf



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/