Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Robert Praetorius" Organization: Ministry of Hobo Regalia, Gauntlet Division To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 12:45:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: HPUX 11 Reply-to: RPraetorius AT AspenRes DOT Com CC: "Flowers, Charmaine (contractor)" Message-ID: <3D492D64.18378.E00E24@localhost> In-reply-to: <6318D0028701D3119DB30000D11BB1A9060CA593@hq10.army.mil> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body > Are the Cygwin commands compatible with HPUX 11? > Thanks in advance My recollection (from having used all 5 at a previous job some years ago) was that HPUX was closer to GNU/Linux than Solaris and AIX, but not as close at OSF/1akaDigitalUNIXakaTru64. My solution was to obtain/build GNU utilities for all the systems I used regularly, so I didn't have to remember random niggly differences in command line options between all the systems. I highly recommend this approach (what was that KO remark about snake oil?). Which is to say: most of what you'll see on Cygwin is, in a defacto sense, more standard than what you'll see on HPUX (because the GNU utilities have been ported to many more platforms that HPUX utilities. POSIX or POSIXish utilities can be had on many platforms, but are of less, ummmmm, utility than GNU utilities). -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/