Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 09:47:05 -0400 From: Jason Tishler Subject: Re: rebase and ME In-reply-to: <1028162032.2788.560.camel@lifelesswks> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-followup-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-id: <20020801134704.GC2664@tishler.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i References: <20020731134339 DOT 85649 DOT qmail AT web21001 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <1028162032 DOT 2788 DOT 560 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> Nicholas, On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 10:33:45AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 23:43, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > > Then it appears that Rebase will never be part of setup until this > > issue is solved. > > Why? Detection of ME is not-that-hard. Bummers. I guess that it's too late to reply with the following: Good. Now I don't have to feel lame about taking forever and then some to add rebase to setup.exe. :,) Instead, I will respond with the following: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-08/msg00003.html > My first comment to Jason about rebasing was that we should implement it > via libbfd. I think the whole ME thing demonstrates that quite nicely. If you figure out how to use libbfd to perform rebasing, then I would be quite willing to rework my low-level rebase routines to use this instead of ReBaseImage(). Thanks, Jason -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/