Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: rebase and ME From: Robert Collins To: Nicholas Wourms Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20020731141609.41111.qmail@web21007.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20020731141609 DOT 41111 DOT qmail AT web21007 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+BSxh+j+iiPd0OkpjiY+" Date: 01 Aug 2002 10:38:17 +1000 Message-Id: <1028162298.2613.571.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-+BSxh+j+iiPd0OkpjiY+ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 00:16, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > Stephan, >=20 > I'm sorry for bringing you in on this thread, but I believe there is > an major underlying problem with the ReBase functions in the > imagehlp.dll distributed with WindowsME. Any external program which > tries to send arguments to the dll results in a segfault [Note: that > this is only confirmed for the ReBase function]. Any attempt to use > the ReBase.exe that comes with the latest Platform SDK results in > corrupted dlls or a segfault. I have confirmed this on 3 other > peoples' machines running WindowsME. Note that this behavior, of > course, is not seen on any of the other versions of Windows. I was > hoping to see if there is anything you are aware of, as there is > nothing in either MSDN or Knowlegebase that I am aware of. If not, > is there any legitimate means of reporting this to Microsoft without > having it ignored or not taken seriously? =20 Yes. (I know I'm not Stephan). You log a support call, as a developer, and say that trying to rebase your installed app for performance is failing on ME, all ME, and nothing but ME. MS then take a couple hundred dollars off you... and you get a technician that owns the case and will follow it through to conclusion. If you are right, you *may* get your money back. If they find cockpit error... well the problem is solved and you are short $$$. I'll happily contribute 50 AUD to such an effort (but it can't be me calling as I don't have an ME install to play with). Rob --=-+BSxh+j+iiPd0OkpjiY+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEABECAAYFAj1IgvkACgkQI5+kQ8LJcoJ62QCgmrJem54Y8ZMzzOgiNrBUSfxz 5X0An2xceNZ6D2aSZ3mzJ+rlFEFsKY9/ =8lts -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+BSxh+j+iiPd0OkpjiY+--