Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 23:52:26 -0500 (Central Daylight Time) From: Michael Hoffman Subject: RE: bash and the delete key In-reply-to: X-X-Sender: grouse AT mail DOT utexas DOT edu To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Stephan Mueller wrote: > From "The Windows Interface Guidelines for Software Design" (covers > Windows 95 and NT! -- so you know it's not brand new :-) > > "The system still supports shortcut assignments available in > earlier versions of Microsoft Windows (Alt+Backspace, Shift+Insert, > Ctrl+Insert, Shift+Delete). You should consider supporting them (though > not documenting them) to support the transition of users." > > (This is a footnote in Appendix B, which documents the standard > shortcuts - Ctrl-C/V/X among them). > > As long as folks don't actually make the transition, I suspect the OS > will continue to support them, but please, let's not encourage folks to > make the transition in the wrong direction :-) I find the CUA clipboard shortcuts (e.g. Ctrl-Insert) quite useful, since there are several applications I use support them OOTB but the ZXCV shortcuts only with reconfiguration (e.g. rxvt, Quicken 99). On my Linux box they are also used on X. If I were going to write a new application I would certainly follow these guidelines. But I don't see any need not to tell people that Shift-Insert works for rxvt OOTB. This is a useful piece of information. -- Michael Hoffman The University of Texas at Austin -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/