Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 21:35:30 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Future ntsec-detection problem in sshd (Re: winsup/cygwin ChangeLog security.cc) Message-ID: <20020728013530.GC11185@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20020725170413 DOT 3469 DOT qmail AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> <005d01c23417$27a656e0$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com> <20020726102233 DOT V3921 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <021301c234eb$a8d6bf00$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com> <20020727111609 DOT O3921 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <013001c23570$993c7280$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com> <20020727161323 DOT GH16216 AT redhat DOT com> <1027817120 DOT 9602 DOT 34 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1027817120.9602.34.camel@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 10:45:20AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 02:13, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> Breaking backwards compatibility gratuitously is not desirable. >> >> In this case however, this could be implemented as a "cygwin_internal" function >> anyway, which would mean not having to worry about loading the function. >> >> However, checking the cygwin api version should be sufficient too. That's >> what it is there for. > >What about a /proc entry? It's already available via uname() and via /proc/version: $ uname -r 1.3.13(0.55/3/2) ^^^^ $ cat /proc/version CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.3.13(0.55/3/2) 2002-07-26 15:57 ^^^^ cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/