Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Future ntsec-detection problem in sshd (Re: winsup/cygwin ChangeLog security.cc) From: Robert Collins To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20020727161323.GH16216@redhat.com> References: <20020725170413 DOT 3469 DOT qmail AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> <005d01c23417$27a656e0$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com> <20020726102233 DOT V3921 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <021301c234eb$a8d6bf00$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com> <20020727111609 DOT O3921 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <013001c23570$993c7280$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com> <20020727161323 DOT GH16216 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-nZ0Ns6Nx4q3YnVnIHz7e" Date: 28 Jul 2002 10:45:20 +1000 Message-Id: <1027817120.9602.34.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-nZ0Ns6Nx4q3YnVnIHz7e Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 02:13, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Breaking backwards compatibility gratuitously is not desirable. >=20 > In this case however, this could be implemented as a "cygwin_internal" fu= nction > anyway, which would mean not having to worry about loading the function. >=20 > However, checking the cygwin api version should be sufficient too. That'= s > what it is there for. What about a /proc entry? Rob --=-nZ0Ns6Nx4q3YnVnIHz7e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEABECAAYFAj1DPqAACgkQI5+kQ8LJcoKz/gCeIBhUGcMd6spQGue6r6iYDPy5 s/oAnjSy2pcgLRTxog1C4+AUPypOFKQc =dvE5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-nZ0Ns6Nx4q3YnVnIHz7e--