Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <20020727150640.1691.qmail@web21005.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 08:06:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Nicholas Wourms Subject: RE: bash and the delete key To: Cygwin Discussion In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020726221514.03f37468@pop3.cris.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- Randall R Schulz wrote: > >So I ask again, is remapping CTRL-V going to cause any problems > for those who > >have no desire to enter tabs on the command line? > > For the ignorant, no, it will cause no problems. For those who need > literal > next and have the legitimate expectation that it will be in the > default > place (CTRL-V), yes it matters and should not be changed. I would like to point out that CTRL-V is used by nano and pico users to scroll down one page. If I'm not mistaken, it is used in lynx as well. In fact, pretty much any readline based application I can think of uses it. Since readline uses inputrc for its bindings, this would probably break the binding in many current applications. I have to agree with Randall that this would be a very bad idea, and probably cause many mailing-list headaches (as most newbies like to use pico/nano). If I know Chris' responses, he'd probably say something like, "Hell will freeze over first before CTRL-V gets changed." Either that, or "We aren't going to change it because we are *mean*." Sorry, it ain't gonna happen, 'Nuff Said. Cheers, Nicholas __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/