Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 10:21:28 -0500 (Central Daylight Time) From: Michael Hoffman Subject: Re: Does cygwin slow things down In-reply-to: X-X-Sender: grouse AT mail DOT utexas DOT edu To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, David E Euresti wrote: > Has anybody done any tests to see just how fast cygwin is? Read the archives. > I just ported a pretty large project and I've been noticing that it's much > slower, and I was wondering if it was cygwin that did it. Yes, Cygwin did it. Let's try and convict it for meanness, put it in jail and throw away the key. Seriously though, nothing is free. The extra layer of portability Cygwin provides costs something in performance even if it is gratis. Some suggestions for speedups despite this: * I find automated virus checkers slow Cygwin's performance a lot * make your PATH as short as possible * make sure it doesn't include network shares or double slashes at the beginning which will cause it to try to access a network share * use mount --executable to speed up checking for executables > So anybody compiled something like apache who can tell me if it runs much > slower? It's available on Setup; try it yourself. -- Michael Hoffman The University of Texas at Austin -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/