Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:54:15 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Is it possible to get a read-only subscription to cygwin-developers, to listen and learn? Message-ID: <20020725155415.GF10541@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D767B2271 AT wilber DOT adroit DOT com> <001b01c233e6$4c206000$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001b01c233e6$4c206000$0100a8c0@wdg.uk.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 03:19:32PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: >>> From: Max Bowsher [mailto:maxb AT ukf DOT net] >>> Subject: Is it possible to get a read-only subscription to >>> cygwin-developers, to listen and learn? >>> ... >>> Would you consider the creation of a >>> 'cygwin-developers-readonly@' list? I >>> imagine that it would be possible to create it as an >>> announcement list, and then >>> subscribe the post address for the new list to cygwin-developers@ ? > >Robinow, David wrote: >> I find perusal of the archives sufficient to keep up with what's >> going on. > >True, that is an alternative. However, everything else cygwin-related comes to >me via email, so I would much prefer my idea. I guess it all depends whether cgf >is feeling mean at the moment :-) It's more of a question of whether there is a mechanism to do this with ezmlm. AFAIK, there isn't. I also have to admit that I am not really wild about the idea of adding lurkers to the cygwin-developers mailing list. We've already seen much confusion where people are cc'ing cygwin-apps instead of cygwin and vice versa. We occasionally even see this with current cygwin-developers subscribers. Making cygwin-developers available to non-subscribers, even via a read-only mechanism, will certainly open the door to more annoying cross-mailing-list traffic. I think there is nearly a 100% certainty of this. So, the web is the best mechanism for reading what's going on in cygwin-developers. Sorry. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/