Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:20:23 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: W2K and sshd, ssh - asks for password Message-ID: <20020725112023.B14134@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20020724163138 DOT F3921 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20020724201757 DOT GC21112 AT redhat DOT com> <00da01c2336a$b940b210$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00da01c2336a$b940b210$0100a8c0@wdg.uk.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 12:34:58AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: > I think that only the POSIX file mode using ACLs requires NTFS. The rest of what > ntsec does just requires an NT OS, and FAT will do. You're right. You just don't get real POSIX permissions on files, but on process level ntsec still works. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/