Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Path: not-for-mail From: "Dylan Cuthbert" Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin Subject: Re: g++ (v.3.1.1-4) -mno-cygwin with a hello world sample crashes oddly Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 10:37:14 +0900 Lines: 47 Message-ID: References: <1027273720 DOT 3d3af3f88166e AT www DOT mailshell DOT com> <20020721231949 DOT GB4030 AT redhat DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pppa20.kyoto-ip.dti.ne.jp Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1027560908 30052 210.159.246.20 (25 Jul 2002 01:35:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 01:35:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 It was my mistake and a lack of integrity on windows part (now *there's* a surprise) that caused the problem. No reason to kick Chris in the goolies, he's so used to using gcc he automatically omitted the -c option, a simple mistake..just as simple as the one I made. Regards --------------------------------- Q-Games, Dylan Cuthbert. http://www.q-games.com wrote in message news:E17XOVg-0007UX-00 AT quimby DOT gnus DOT org... > On 22 Jul 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 10:48:40AM -0700, > > news AT garydjones DOT mailshell DOT com wrote: > >>On 21 Jul 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >>> When I did my test case, I actually correctly > >>> did not use the -c option to try to create an executable > >>> and I never noticed the cockpit error. > > > I DIDN'T NOTICE the -c. What part of "I never noticed the > > cockpit error" did you have problems with? > > What I have "problems" with is the first part of the sentence in > which you state that you "correctly did not use the -c option". > That is patently absurd when you were trying to find the > reported error - it was incorrect not to use the -c. I have left > the quote in, should your memory fail you. > > > Just to make it clear: I was no different than anyone else > > here, apparently. > > Not "was", "am". Nice to see that you recognise the fact. > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/