Message-Id: <200207241541.g6OFfwt15073@delorie.com> Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Sent: 24 Jul 2002 15:41:06 GMT Subject: Re: g++ (v.3.1.1-4) -mno-cygwin with a hello world sample crashes oddly From: news AT garydjones DOT mailshell DOT com References: <1027273720 DOT 3d3af3f88166e AT www DOT mailshell DOT com> <20020721231949 DOT GB4030 AT redhat DOT com> User-Agent: Xnews/4.11.09 X-No-Archive: yes To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Gate: Hamster/1.3.23.185 NewsToMail-Gate Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 17:34:20 +0200 On 22 Jul 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 10:48:40AM -0700, > news AT garydjones DOT mailshell DOT com wrote: >>On 21 Jul 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> When I did my test case, I actually correctly >>> did not use the -c option to try to create an executable >>> and I never noticed the cockpit error. > I DIDN'T NOTICE the -c. What part of "I never noticed the > cockpit error" did you have problems with? What I have "problems" with is the first part of the sentence in which you state that you "correctly did not use the -c option". That is patently absurd when you were trying to find the reported error - it was incorrect not to use the -c. I have left the quote in, should your memory fail you. > Just to make it clear: I was no different than anyone else > here, apparently. Not "was", "am". Nice to see that you recognise the fact. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/