Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <00b001c23284$4ba76a50$0400a8c0@JIMGEORGE>
From: "Jim George" <jim DOT george AT blueyonder DOT co DOT uk>
To: "Robinow, David" <drobinow AT dayton DOT adroit DOT com>
Cc: "Cygwin ML" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D767B226D AT wilber DOT adroit DOT com>
Subject: Re: Odd mount and path problem
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 21:05:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

David,

    I also don't think you do but I've seen mount lists that show things
like /usr/X11R6/bin as a mount point and I don't understand why this is
necessary, especially when /usr is already mounted.  Unless X11R6/bin is on
a different drive (logical or physical).

    Does that make sense?

Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robinow, David" <drobinow AT dayton DOT adroit DOT com>
To: "'Jim George'" <jim DOT george AT blueyonder DOT co DOT uk>
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 7:31 PM
Subject: RE: Odd mount and path problem


> I'm not sure you do.  Could you give me an example?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim George [mailto:jim DOT george AT blueyonder DOT co DOT uk]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 1:12 PM
> > To: Robinow, David
> > Subject: Re: Odd mount and path problem
> >
> >
> > David,
> >
> >     thanks for pitching in but I don't think it answers my question.
> >
> >     Why do I have to explicitly mount sub-directories of
> > /cygwin when they
> > are mentioned in my PATH statement(s)?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Jim
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Robinow, David" <drobinow AT dayton DOT adroit DOT com>
> > To: "'Larry V. Streepy, Jr.'" <streepy AT healthlanguage DOT com>
> > Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 6:05 PM
> > Subject: RE: Odd mount and path problem
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > From: Larry V. Streepy, Jr. [mailto:streepy AT healthlanguage DOT com]
> > > > Subject: Re: Odd mount and path problem
> > > >
> > > > I got an explanation that had something to do with the
> > current drive
> > > > affecting the way /cygdrive is interpreted.  However, I
> > wasn't using
> > > > /cygdrive in my path, so I don't understand the real
> > reason that you
> > > > have to include the drive letter in mount table.
> > >  I think you misinterpreted the answer. /cygdrive has
> > nothing to do with
> > > this.
> > >
> > >   The mount point:
> > >     \cygwin\sbin on /sbin type system (binmode)
> > >   means that if cygwin sees a file spec /sbin/blah/what.txt
> > >   It looks in the mount table for /sbin/blah. Assuming
> > that's not found it
> > > looks for /sbin. That exists and so it looks for the file in
> > > \cygwin\sbin\blah\what.txt
> > >  What disk drive would you expect to find that file in?
> > Well, for as long
> > as
> > > I can remember, Microsoft has looked in what is known as
> > the "current
> > > drive".  That means your mount point changes every time you
> > change your
> > > current directory to a different drive.
> > >  I don't think "mount" should allow you to do this. I
> > consider it a bug.
> > > mount should require a drive letter.
> > >  Note that the location of the "/" mount point is not
> > relevant here.  It
> > > would only be looked at, in the above case, if there were
> > no /sbin mount
> > > point.
> > > >
> > > > Jim George wrote:
> > > > > From: "Larry V. Streepy, Jr." <streepy AT healthlanguage DOT com>
> > > > > Subject: Re: Odd mount and path problem
> > > > >>Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
> > > > >>>>d:\cygwin\home on /home type system (binmode)
> > > > >>>>\cygwin\sbin on /sbin type system (binmode)
> > > > >>>>\cygwin\bin on /bin type system (binmode)
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>basic response is :
> > > > >>>you miss the DOS drive letter in your mount points
> > > > >>>and the / moint point looks wrong (maybe d:\cygwin ?):
> > > > >>>D: on / type system (binmode)
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Excellent - that was the problem, although I really
> > don't understand
> > > > >>why.  Once d:/ is mounted on /, why do I need to qualify
> > > > >> all the other mount points?
> > > > >>
> > > > > Did you get an answer to this Larry?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> > > Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> > > Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> > > FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> > >
> >
>


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/