Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <20020723005808.81023.qmail@web21004.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:58:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Nicholas Wourms Subject: RE: autoconf issues [often when upgrading from 2.13->2.53a] To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mark, Are you aware of how many instances of sed autoconf runs, let alone libtool? I'll post the statement for the original issue this thread describes, but as for anything else, that will be more difficult. Unfortunately TeX is very convoluted in it's own way, so trying to figure out what pdfTeX is doing with sed is like searching for a needle in the haystack. I'll see what I can do. Cheers, Nicholas > I'm using Win2K. > > I'm pretty reluctant to point the finger at 'sed', but > unfortunately I > don't have any more clues at this time. Can you add 'set -xv' to > the > generated configure script at the place in the code where 'sed' is > called, and post the result? That, along with the input stream, > could > help to debug that problem. Also, it would help to know what > configure.in statements are generating the corresponding code in > the > generated configure script, if you're able to identify those > statements. > > As usual, three basics are needed before the problem can be > debugged: > > 1. The command(s) that are "causing" the problem. > 2. The results you expected. > 3. The results you got. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nicholas Wourms [mailto:nwourms AT yahoo DOT com] > > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:55 PM > > To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > > Subject: RE: autoconf issues [often when upgrading from > 2.13->2.53a] > > > > > > > > --- "Harig, Mark A." wrote: > > > Have you tried downgrading to the stable tools (2.13) to see if > the > > > problem is still occurring, or is that not an option (i.e, the > > > configure.in requires 2.53)? > > > I had a problem recently where it appeared that sed was running > in > > > an > > > infinite loop. When I downgraded to the stable tools, the > problem > > > disappeared. > > > > Unfortunately I have to use 2.53, otherwise libtool will not > build > > the dll's properly. You hit the nail right on the head, there is > > something awefully wierd going on, and I think sed is at the > center > > of it. Why just the other day I was trying to use texi2pdf, and > > wouldn't you know it sed was stuck in an infinite loop. What OS > are > > you running? My initial opinion is that the sed is experiencing > > bit-rot. It hasn't been updated since 2000 (the code itself > since > > '98), you know. The problem is that this is so random, there's > no > > easy way to tell for sure. I just have a hunch at this point... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/