Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3D3AC767.4090907@gmx.li>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 10:38:31 -0400
From: Shawn Behrens <sbehrens AT gmx DOT li>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: news: cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: cygwin 3.11 stable for WinXP?
References: <OE290KAO6gxysfr1Tb000004f0d AT hotmail DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

>is cygwin 3.11 or any other version stable enough for Windows XP PRO?
>
The current version is plenty stable. It depends on what you wish to do, 
though. The packages you intend to use. Beta packages are, obviously, in 
beta stage. We use Cygwin with sshd in a production environment to get 
remote shell access to Windows machines, and yes, it has made life a lot 
easier.

Shawn



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/