Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <015801c22f7b$bd7a58b0$0100a8c0@wdg.uk.ibm.com> From: "Max Bowsher" To: "Robert Collins" , References: <200207180251 DOT IAA00953 AT sentry-lan DOT unibase DOT com> <20020718151125 DOT 81549 DOT qmail AT web21004 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <20020719165901 DOT GC376 AT tishler DOT net> <04aa01c22f71$611e70b0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <00b801c22f77$66ff0d40$0100a8c0 AT wdg DOT uk DOT ibm DOT com> <053f01c22f7a$77331ff0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Subject: Re: is there a sendmail ? Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 00:26:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 >> Well, I'm currently trying to learn the details of setup.exe's >> package handling code, to squish the bug I've mentioned here >> (packages show up even if not cached, present since 2.248). But, Oops! I meant to type 2.258 - sorry to cause confusion. >> once I've done that, I'd quite like a reason to learn more about >> cygwin internals - although I'm not sure how much I will be able to >> understand well enough to change. >> >> So, if time rather than complexity has been the problem, I might be >> able to help. Is your work-in-progress anywhere downloadable? > > The implementation needs > 1) updating to HEAD. > 2) fork handlers reimplemented (currently broken). > and that should be it. > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-09/msg01780.html Got it - thanks! Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/