Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" To: Subject: RE: New Mutt 1.4 package??? Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 20:49:19 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal In-Reply-To: <20020715135125.GE2372@tishler.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal > Gary, > [snip] > > I've been considering the exact same thing, but I was a bit reluctant > > to breach the subject, as your cup already looks like it overfloweth > > ;-). > > It is and my shop vac and sump pump are broken too! :,) > That's gotta be one heck of a mess! ;-) [snip] > > > Since I already maintain Cygwin fetchmail and procmail > > > and I'm a "heavy" Cygwin mutt user, this may make sense... > > > > That's been my main problem I guess; I'm *not* a heavy mutt user, I > > just use it occaisionally to send emails from scripts. I got it to > > the point where that works reliably from text mounts and then > > dereliction of duty set in. > > I didn't know that you have already dealt with the text vs. binary mode > issues. This is good news. > I've dealt with the ones I know about, which means mainly getting sending, receiving, attachments, viewing, and editing working (wow, that sounds like I did a lot! ;-)). I have not even looked at things like PGP, fetchmail, or sendmail interaction. > > Let's do this (again, if you're willing to take over): No Sleep > 'Til 1.4. I > > don't hit the sack tonight until I've finished and uploaded the mutt-1.4-1 > > package. That'll be my swan song, and then if everybody's in > agreement and we > > can get all the proper clearances, mutt and hence all of Cygwin's mail > > functionality is Tishler territory forevermore ;-). > > I'm really backed up right now. Would you be willing to deal with the > currently reported problems? > > o source package seems to be broken > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg01097.html > Fixed, that was just an upload problem. > o read-only mbox problem under Windows 9x/Me > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg00963.html > This one's got me a bit stymied at the moment. > o lock count exceeded problem > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg01097.html > Looking into this one now. > I'm willing (without coercion) to assume maintainership after the above > have been resolved. Otherwise, I'm still willing to assume > maintainership but I cannot guarantee when the above will be resolved. > > BTW, does your mutt build display international characters correctly? > Mine does not. > Good point, I haven't checked yet. Well, ok, I'll do one more release before retiring the jersey ;-). -- Gary R. Van Sickle Brewer. Patriot. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/