Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 19:31:44 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin Digest 17 Jul 2002 14:08:15 -0000 Issue 2091 Message-ID: <20020718233144.GE15374@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <51B9E312 DOT 2C874494 DOT 0E99EA58 AT netscape DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51B9E312.2C874494.0E99EA58@netscape.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:47:04AM -0400, chriscard1 AT netscape DOT net wrote: >>Subject: Re: gprof and cygwin >>Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:03:14 -0400 >>From: Christopher Faylor >>To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >> >>On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 09:49:00PM +0900, Dylan Cuthbert wrote: >>>>You may be interested that I tried replacing libgmon.a and gcrt0.o that >>>>came in the new Cygwin release with the files that were in the B20 >>>>release, and gprof worked again. >> >>Of course it worked in B20. ?We weren't so mean back then. > >To be fair to Dylan, he didn't write that, I did, and it was quite a >while back too. I was merely pointing out that the old version worked >so that people could work around the current problem and so that if >anyone wanted to fix the problem they had something to go on. No >criticism of anyone intended. No criticism intended. However, rest assured that any time I see B20, I will respond similarly. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/