Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <000601c22db5$18de7d80$0100a8c0@wdg.uk.ibm.com> From: "Max Bowsher" To: References: Subject: Re: New setup pre-release - feedback needed Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 12:48:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Peter A. Castro wrote: > On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Robert Collins wrote: > > While I do like the status of knowing just what setup is scanning as > part of the package loading process, it now takes much, much longer > to load from an "Install from Local Directory" scenario :-) (up from > 5 seconds to about 1 minute, 45 seconds). It's a kind of a rare > scenario (I'm probably one of the few who keeps a full downloaded > image of all of cygwin (kinda like a mirror site)), I do too. I am bandwidth-challenged (24K dialup - poor telephone lines), so I always have a local copy of anything I install. >and it's not like > I run setup more than once every few days, so it's an adequate trade- > off for more status on the package load. I suppose it might be better at the completion of each download, and when a package is actually installed - but then we lose the possibility of marking bad packages in the chooser. Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/