Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <200207170110.g6H1A1Z28086@d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: d-ip-129-15-78-125.cs.ou.edu: jcast owned process doing -bs To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gzip.exe as symlink... In-Reply-To: Message from Nicholas Wourms of "Mon, 15 Jul 2002 14:02:14 PDT." <20020715210214 DOT 69438 DOT qmail AT web21003 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 20:10:01 -0500 From: Jon Cast Nicholas Wourms wrote: > Sigh, as usual the emacs camp always misses the point. ``As usual ... always''. Not simple or elegant. Not relevant, but neither are your comments. > You use a shell for file operations So `vi foo.gz' works why? > and you use an editor for editing. Right. Not a viitor. Not an emacsitor. Those aren't even words! > Why is there any need to muddle the two? Vi is simple and elegant, And is an actual editor. > whereas emacs is well... Not an editor. It's a desktop environment under the delusion it's an editor. It's still a better editor (no ugly i/a/e/etc. just to type in text) and desktop environment (M-x customize is the best thing I've seen) than anything else out there. > rather bloated For a desktop environment? > and not very elegant. How can something be more elegant than Lisp? > Would you use a chainsaw to cut a diamond? I think not... No. But I wouldn't precariously balance said diamond between my fore-finger and tongue, either. I'd use a real tool to hold it. > Cheers, > Nicholas Jon Cast -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/