Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <023601c22ce2$48b5cbe0$a50aa8c0@pcse5> From: "BiDuS" To: Subject: RE: Cygwin is SLOW Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 18:03:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 I've tried both slow and fast perl scripts on my machine (AMD XP1700, W2K) If test.file is on a local directory $ perl slowchm.pl 113.4 chmods per sec $ perl fastchm.pl 2923.6 chmods per sec if test.file is on a mounted directory $ perl slowchm.pl 51.9 chmods per sec $ perl fastchm.pl 143 chmods per sec Could anyone explain the performance ratio for both scripts ??? btw, on a "slow" linux p3-866 test.file being on a remote directory $ perl slowchm.pl 187.8 chmods per sec $ perl fastchm.pl 3096.8 chmods per sec test.file being on a local directory $ perl slowchm.pl 181.7 chmods per sec $ perl fastchm.pl 263232.5 chmods per sec (arf!) I got a wider gap for small c program opening and closing about 650 files It takes 0.750 s for local files and about 2 s for distant files On the linux machine, it's just 0.1 s for distant files... Is the _open() routine guilty ? Is it linked to the unix AND dos path compatibility ? Anyone as a hint to speed this up ? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/