Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:52:51 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Toplevel configury of src
Message-ID: <20020713165251.GA30143@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20020709183342 DOT GA18151 AT doctormoo DOT dyndns DOT org> <0b2701c227a1$0fc34ab0$2300a8c0 AT LAPTOP>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0b2701c227a1$0fc34ab0$2300a8c0@LAPTOP>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 09:33:42AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>> Should it mean "Don't build or use the newlib in the tree; use installed
>> libs and headers, or the ones specified with --with-libs and
>> --with-headers"?
>>
>> Should it be illegal, and give an error message?
>
>Chris is probably the person with the canonical answer. However, "illegal
>and an error", or "illegal, warn, and build newlib anyway" both make sense
>to me.

I answered this in the gcc mailing list, but I agree with Robert.  Either
of the above is fine.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/