Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 13:48:03 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Available for test: gcc-3.1.1-2 gcc2-2.95.3-8
Message-ID: <20020712174803.GA7381@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20020711162955 DOT GA11047 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2DBE07 DOT 3040909 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020712000601 DOT GA11148 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2E51ED DOT 3080902 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020712040949 DOT GB2057 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2E5C1B DOT 9050604 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020712044319 DOT GA10089 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2E65AC DOT 1070509 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020712052250 DOT GB30885 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2EF62E DOT 1040209 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3D2EF62E.1040209@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:30:54AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>
>
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 01:14:20AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>
>>>>It is in the last two lines of the specs file:
>>>>
>>>>#define LIBSTDCXX "-lstdc++-2"
>>>>#define FORTRAN_LIBRARY "-lg2c-2"
>>>>
>>>
>>>I'll look for it -- it's not in my "normal" sources, so I guess normal 
>>>sources use a default definition from somewhere else.  I'll download 
>>>your gcc2-src package and use that...
>>>
>>
>>The gcc-2.95.3 that I distribute has a lot of gcc/mingw changes.  Many
>>of them come from Mumit.  So, if you grab "my" package you get something
>>that is different from the sources at gcc.gnu.org.
>>
>
>
>Well, I guess "normal" wasn't the correct term.  I'm using Danny's 
>gcc-2.95.3 -src package from mingw.org (seemed appropriate since I was 
>building a mingw-target compiler).
>
>I'm unsure how large the differences are between your version and 
>Danny's (of 2.95.3).  I guess I'll find out...

They should be pretty close except for some cygwin additions, I would think.

In the future they should be based on the same code base so they should
only differ by release date.

>>>>The files themselves get munged by mknetrel's extra/gcc2 script.
>>>>
>>>Ah.  But if you munge the filenames at install time, then don't stage2 
>>>and stage3 break?
>>>
>>
>>I copy around stuff by hand for the first stage (building the cross
>>compiler).  I don't build a native compiler first, so there are only
>>two stages.
>>
>>And, yes, copying stuff around by hand is a real pain...
>
>As in, "a PITA to maintain".  Hopefully, gcc2 will be a "release and 
>forget" package.

That's been my assumption.  If I have to do this too often, I'm going
to have to find some way of automating it, that's for sure.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/