Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3D2EF62E.1040209@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:30:54 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Available for test: gcc-3.1.1-2 gcc2-2.95.3-8 References: <20020711044304 DOT GA3292 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2D3205 DOT 7080606 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020711162955 DOT GA11047 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2DBE07 DOT 3040909 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020712000601 DOT GA11148 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2E51ED DOT 3080902 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020712040949 DOT GB2057 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2E5C1B DOT 9050604 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020712044319 DOT GA10089 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2E65AC DOT 1070509 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020712052250 DOT GB30885 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 01:14:20AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > >>>It is in the last two lines of the specs file: >>> >>>#define LIBSTDCXX "-lstdc++-2" >>>#define FORTRAN_LIBRARY "-lg2c-2" >>> >> >>I'll look for it -- it's not in my "normal" sources, so I guess normal >>sources use a default definition from somewhere else. I'll download >>your gcc2-src package and use that... >> > > The gcc-2.95.3 that I distribute has a lot of gcc/mingw changes. Many > of them come from Mumit. So, if you grab "my" package you get something > that is different from the sources at gcc.gnu.org. > Well, I guess "normal" wasn't the correct term. I'm using Danny's gcc-2.95.3 -src package from mingw.org (seemed appropriate since I was building a mingw-target compiler). I'm unsure how large the differences are between your version and Danny's (of 2.95.3). I guess I'll find out... >>>The files themselves get munged by mknetrel's extra/gcc2 script. >>> >>Ah. But if you munge the filenames at install time, then don't stage2 >>and stage3 break? >> > > I copy around stuff by hand for the first stage (building the cross > compiler). I don't build a native compiler first, so there are only > two stages. > > And, yes, copying stuff around by hand is a real pain... As in, "a PITA to maintain". Hopefully, gcc2 will be a "release and forget" package. > I'm on 4001 now. Forgot to merge with the current gcc branch. Looked > like an possible code gen bug got fixed. > > Thank god for ccache, though. I'd still be scratching my head about the > best way to deal with -mno-cygwin if it wasn't for that. It's really > amazing. > > Oops. Forgot to regen stage one for this go-around. That would screw > up the specs file. Time for build 4002 and 4003. Sounds very frustrating. Thanks for all your hard work -- and take care of your hands. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/