Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 01:22:50 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Available for test: gcc-3.1.1-2 gcc2-2.95.3-8
Message-ID: <20020712052250.GB30885@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20020711044304 DOT GA3292 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2D3205 DOT 7080606 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020711162955 DOT GA11047 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2DBE07 DOT 3040909 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020712000601 DOT GA11148 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2E51ED DOT 3080902 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020712040949 DOT GB2057 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2E5C1B DOT 9050604 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020712044319 DOT GA10089 AT redhat DOT com> <3D2E65AC DOT 1070509 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3D2E65AC.1070509@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 01:14:20AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>It is in the last two lines of the specs file:
>>
>>#define LIBSTDCXX "-lstdc++-2"
>>#define FORTRAN_LIBRARY "-lg2c-2"
>
>
>I'll look for it -- it's not in my "normal" sources, so I guess normal 
>sources use a default definition from somewhere else.  I'll download 
>your gcc2-src package and use that...

The gcc-2.95.3 that I distribute has a lot of gcc/mingw changes.  Many
of them come from Mumit.  So, if you grab "my" package you get something
that is different from the sources at gcc.gnu.org.

>>The files themselves get munged by mknetrel's extra/gcc2 script.
>
>Ah.  But if you munge the filenames at install time, then don't stage2 
>and stage3 break?

I copy around stuff by hand for the first stage (building the cross
compiler).  I don't build a native compiler first, so there are only
two stages.

And, yes, copying stuff around by hand is a real pain...

>>(Who's off for the 4000th rebuild of these packages...)
>
>
><groan>

I'm on 4001 now.  Forgot to merge with the current gcc branch.  Looked
like an possible code gen bug got fixed.

Thank god for ccache, though.  I'd still be scratching my head about the
best way to deal with -mno-cygwin if it wasn't for that.  It's really
amazing.

Oops.  Forgot to regen stage one for this go-around.  That would screw
up the specs file.  Time for build 4002 and 4003.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/