Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Originating-IP: [202.7.175.32]
From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps AT hotmail DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <3D2C4C1F DOT 8010002 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20020710161833 DOT 36437 DOT qmail AT web21004 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <3D2C7077 DOT 6040204 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Subject: Re: gcc2-2.95.3-7 uploaded
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:25:22 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID: <OE25ecvkjGXWmp0CaQv0000504d@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jul 2002 01:25:21.0406 (UTC) FILETIME=[D2E349E0:01C22879]


----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 3:35 AM
Subject: Re: gcc2-2.95.3-7 uploaded


>
>
> Nicholas Wourms wrote:
>
> > --- Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> wrote:
> >
> >>(*) cygwin itself is the only other C++ DLL -- but all of its exports
> >>are non-mangled...
> >>
> >
> > Are you forgetting about the db3.x/db4.x c++ api?  I'm revving up to
> > release v3 next week, but I need to know if this will cause it problems.
>
>
> They aren't "out" yet.  So I didn't mention them.  If one or both are
> released before gcc-3.1.1 becomes official, then yes, they should also
> be added to the "Maybe a c++ ABI problem" list.
>

My worthless 2 cents - since the default compiler is going to be 3.1.1, all
nesecery packages should be recompiled for it. If compiler was going to be
named g++-3 or similar, then maybe there would be a question.

Gareth

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/